A Cairo-based crew of lifelong runners and analysts obsessed with documenting how speedrunning evolves, one route at a time.
Read the StoryNo hype, no filler — just rigorous analysis written by runners who actually care.
Every article traces route history, compares category splits, and cross-references community documentation before a single word gets published.
Our contributors have submitted times, watched thousands of hours of VODs, and lived through meta shifts — this isn't secondhand commentary.
Headlines say exactly what an article delivers. If the piece is about movement tech in a single game, that's all it covers — fully and honestly.
No affiliate walls, no sponsored rankings. Our editorial decisions are driven by what the speedrunning community actually finds meaningful.
We document record progressions and routing milestones so the history of each category is preserved for future runners and researchers.
We don't repost community notes. We build our own breakdowns of movement techniques, timing windows, and optimization logic from the ground up.
Years of consistent publishing, a growing reader base, and a catalog runners actually bookmark.
I was trying to understand why the wrong-warp route in one of my categories kept getting contested — found a B Happy Health breakdown from two years ago that laid out every decision point. Saved me hours of digging through old forum threads.
The movement tech articles here are genuinely different from what you find on YouTube. They actually explain the frame data context instead of just showing you what to do. I've recommended this site to everyone in our local group.
I used the route progression archive when writing a university paper on competitive gaming culture. The documentation was detailed and traced changes across multiple years without overstating things. Really solid editorial standards.